Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Could we have a page for those of us trying to convert old adventures and old adventure systems (e.g. Scott Adams, Magnetic Scrolls ad nauseam - akin to ...ntent, improving them, fixing typos, and so on, just like any other page. (Spammers, however, are not welcome to edit them.) If you want to make drastic change
    39 KB (6,561 words) - 17:31, 3 July 2020
  • ...have that person's explicit permission. If so, how should we format it so spammers won't harvest it?
    12 KB (1,865 words) - 19:43, 22 November 2018
  • I tried deleting all cookies and old files from my browser just in case but I still get this message when I log The problem was in the old code. With the upgrade, there should be no way to recreate that error. --[[
    25 KB (4,320 words) - 22:08, 27 February 2019
  • * Obvious and blatant spammers will be blocked indefinitely. We have no tolerance for that sort of nonsens * If it's obvious that spammers are making multiple accounts, [[IFWiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrats]] may merge
    2 KB (392 words) - 05:48, 17 November 2011
  • :: ''As spammers continue to spam IFWiki, we add their sites to our blacklist. Unfortunately
    2 KB (301 words) - 08:36, 22 November 2011
  • :You're welcome! (Of course, we'd all prefer that there wouldn't be any spammers and therefore no need for that TrustedUser category...) --[[User:Eriorg|Eri
    6 KB (980 words) - 03:28, 29 May 2020
  • ...reviously-blank Talk pages as Kynilyator, Qoylan and the user-id-deficient spammers; presumably either the same source or identical bots. ...ides no links to its product, but no one said spam has to be useful to its spammers. It's still spam.
    8 KB (1,207 words) - 23:00, 13 September 2011
  • ...ways will be, simply because it's too tempting and too public a target for spammers and vandals. Only [[IFWiki:Administrators|IFWiki administrators]] may edit ...icle pages may be marked protected if they prove to be frequent targets of spammers and vandals. There is, at present, no policy for when an article may return
    1 KB (244 words) - 11:13, 27 September 2009
  • ...he ability to delete user accounts. Several accounts believed to belong to spammers were deleted at that time.
    2 KB (255 words) - 13:31, 23 October 2011
  • ...u were legit, you'd return, and if you were a spammer, you wouldn't, since spammers tend not to return to an account they've abused. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Wel ..., I apologize for blocking you. Sorry about that, but I really can't stand spammers. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 13:08, 9 June 2011 (PDT)
    2 KB (312 words) - 21:26, 9 June 2011