Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Scott Adams"

From IFWiki

 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I can't help but think that a category for a person is both unusual and unnecessary, especially when the main article on that person is still a stub article. However, I am willing to wait to see if more information on Scott Adams and related topics is added first. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 16:55, 2 Nov 2005 (Central Standard Time)
 
I can't help but think that a category for a person is both unusual and unnecessary, especially when the main article on that person is still a stub article. However, I am willing to wait to see if more information on Scott Adams and related topics is added first. -- [[User:Dswxyz|David Welbourn]] 16:55, 2 Nov 2005 (Central Standard Time)
 +
 +
Sorry, that would be my fault. I was trying to come up with a way that links all of the SA stuff together. Everyone knows his games as "Scott Adams" games rather than Adventure International, or AI-UK games etc. It seems its like "kleenex", it has been branded. What would you suggest, or how would you suggest we link it all?

Revision as of 15:12, 3 November 2005

I can't help but think that a category for a person is both unusual and unnecessary, especially when the main article on that person is still a stub article. However, I am willing to wait to see if more information on Scott Adams and related topics is added first. -- David Welbourn 16:55, 2 Nov 2005 (Central Standard Time)

Sorry, that would be my fault. I was trying to come up with a way that links all of the SA stuff together. Everyone knows his games as "Scott Adams" games rather than Adventure International, or AI-UK games etc. It seems its like "kleenex", it has been branded. What would you suggest, or how would you suggest we link it all?